United States v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis
844 F.2d 36 · 1988
Citation profile
53 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 94 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably United States v. Wallach (1991), United States v. Eisen (1992)
53 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 3731 · 22 U.S.C. § 2751 (Arms Export Control Act) · 22 U.S.C. § 2753 · 22 U.S.C. § 2778
Relies on McNally v. United States · Carpenter v. United States · Durland v. United States · Batson v. Kentucky · Hammerschmidt v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]onetheless, this may be the correct view of the statute,”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“ancillary to a regulation, not to property.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“scheme or artifice ... for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.