Agcaoili v. Gustafson’s Empirical Analysis
844 F.2d 620 · 1988
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 8 U.S.C. § 1421 (§ 310 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1446 (§ 335 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1503 (§ 360 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Michel v. United States · Carson v. American Brands, Inc. · United States v. Mendoza · Texas State Commission for the Blind v. United States · Switzerland Cheese Association Inc v. E Horne's Market Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A trial court has the power to control its own calendar.”); Mediterranean Enterprises, Inc. v. Ssangyong, 708 F.2d 1458 , 1465 (9th Cir.1983) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.