Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 844 F.2d 668 - Caribbean Marine Services Co. v. Baldrige

Caribbean Marine Services Co. v. Baldrige’s Empirical Analysis

844 F.2d 668 · 1988

Citation profile

152
cited by 152 later decisions
2
states following
February 2020
most recently cited

56 federal appellate · 29 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 152 later decisions — most recently February 2020 · most notably Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. Coalition for Economic Equity (1991), Fund for Animals, Inc. v. Lujan (1992)

56 federal appellate · 29 district · 2 state decisions

58019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Relies on O'Shea v. Littleton · Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo · Garcia v. Ingram · Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League · Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press International Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 152 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “plaintiff must demonstrate immediate threatened [irreparable] injury as a prerequisite to preliminary injunctive relief”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials v. International Conference of Building Officials · Nevada v. United States
  2. “must determine whether the district court applied the proper legal standard in issuing the injunction and whether it abused its discretion in applying that standard.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Kcop Television Channel Inc v. Telemundo Group Inc · K.C.O.P. Television, Channel 13, Inc. v. Telemundo Group, Inc., Estrella Communication, Inc.
  3. “consider the public interest in balancing the hardships when the public interest may be affected.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Jones v. Kincheloe · Department of Parks and Re-Creation for the State of California v. Bazaar Del Mundo Inc., a California Corporation

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.