Local 210, Laborers' International Union of North America v. Labor Relations Division Associated General Contractors’s Empirical Analysis
844 F.2d 69 · 1988
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Bird v. Shearson Lehman/American Express, Inc. (1989), Clarett v. National Football League (2004)
15 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 17 (§ 6 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 29 U.S.C. § 104 (Norris-LaGuardia Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 52 (§ 20 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914)
Relies on Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc · Brown v. General Services Administration · Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahon · Oregon v. Kennedy · United Mine Workers v. Pennington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"First, the agreement at issue must further goals that are protected by national labor law and that are within the scope of traditionally mandatory subjects of collective bargaining. Second, the agreement must not impose a 'direct restraint on the business market [that] has substantial anticompetitive effects, both actual and potential, that would not follow naturally from the elimination of competition over wages and working conditions [that results from collective bargaining agreements].’ ””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[N]othing in this subsection shall apply to an agreement between a labor organization and an employer in the construction industry relating to the contracting or subcontracting of work to be done at the site of the construction, alteration, painting, or repair of a building, structure, or other work....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“so intimately related to wages, hours and working conditions that the union['s] successful attempt to obtain [a particular] provision through bona fide, arm's-length bargaining in pursuit of their own labor union policies . . . falls within the protection of national labor policy.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sheet Metal Division Of Capitol District Sheet Metal, Roofing & Air Conditioning Contractors Association, Inc. v. Local 38 Of The Sheet Metal Workers International Association · Sheet Metal Division of Capitol District Sheet Metal, Roofing & Air Conditioning Contractors Ass'n v. Local 38 of the Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.