Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 844 F.2d 971 - United States v. Gotay

United States v. Gotay’s Empirical Analysis

844 F.2d 971 · 1988

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 2 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2026 · most notably Davis v. United States (1994), 125 Ill. 2d 50 - People v. Evans (1988)

22 federal appellate · 2 district · 11 state decisions

36019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Edwards v. Arizona · Michigan v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[W]hen a suspect makes an equivocal statement that arguably can be construed as a request for counsel, interrogation must cease except for narrow questions designed to clarify the earlier statement and the suspect's desire for counsel.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'[we must] give a broad ... interpretation to a defendant's request for counsel,'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “knowingly and intelligently [and voluntarily] waived the right . . . invoked.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.