F/s Airlease II Inc v. Simon S-J Swig Investment Company Aircraft Trust No F/s Airlease II Inc Simon S-J F/s Airlease II Inc’s Empirical Analysis
844 F.2d 99 · 1988
Citation profile
40 federal appellate · 12 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 195 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Arochem Corporation Na v. M Coan, In re Marvel Entertainment Group, Inc. (1998)
40 federal appellate · 12 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1107 · 11 U.S.C. § 327 · 11 U.S.C. § 503 · 28 U.S.C. § 1293 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Bender v. Williamsport Area School District · Pacor Inc. v. Higgins · Universal Minerals, Inc. v. C. A. Hughes & Co. · United States v. Sisson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 195 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether the applicant or some other person bore responsibility for applying for approval; whether the applicant was under time pressure to begin service without approval; the amount of delay after the applicant learned that initial approval had not been granted; the extent to which compensation to the applicant will prejudice innocent third parties; and other relevant factors.”
20 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Except as otherwise provided in this section, the trustee, with the court’s approval, may employ one or more attorneys, accountants, appraisers, auctioneers, or other professional persons, that do not hold or represent an interest adverse to the estate, and that are disinterested persons, to represent or assist the trustee in carrying out the trustee’s duties under this title.”
17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he unique characteristics of bankruptcy cases have led us to 'consistently consider[ ] finality in a more pragmatic and less technical way in bankruptcy cases than in other situations.' " F/S Airlease II, Inc. v. Simon, 844 F.2d 99 , 103 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 137 , 102 L.Ed.2d 110 (1988) (quoting In re Amatex Corp., 755 F.2d 1034, 1039 (3d Cir.1985)). "Bankruptcy cases frequently involve protracted proceedings with many parties participating. To avoid the waste of time and resources that might result from reviewing discrete portions of the action only after a plan of reorganization is approved, courts have permitted appellate review of orders that in other contexts might be considered interlocutory.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Bh & P Inc., a New Jersey Corporation Philip Alan Herman, Bruce Berkow, Debtors. Appeal of Carmen J. Maggio, Individually and as Trustee for Bh & P Inc., Debtor and Ravin, Greenberg & Marks, P.A., (Formerly Ravin, Greenberg & Zackin, p.a.) · 550 F. App'x 115 - Bayer Business & Technology Services v. AGR Premier Consulting, Inc.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.