Jackson v. Duckworth’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Fay v. Noia · Pennsylvania v. Finley · Darr v. Burford · Bartone v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“petition does not ask the court to address the merits of the federal claims in his state-court petition; instead, Jackson argues that the State's failure to resolve his post-conviction petition, in itself, constitutes a deprivation of due process and requires his release.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Jackson v. Duckworth“'conditional writ,' whereby the State is ordered to decide the prisoner's appeal within a time certain or else release the prisoner.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Jackson v. Duckworth“a colorable state or federal claim that would warrant reversal of [his] conviction,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Jackson v. Duckworth
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.