Parris v. Pappas’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 3612 (§ 812 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968)) · 42 U.S.C. § 3613 (§ 813 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968))
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Blum v. Stenson · Farrar v. Hobby · City of Riverside v. Rivera · New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[T]he court must: (1) determine the reasonable hourly rate; (2) determine the number of hours reasonably expended; (3) multiply the two to calculate the presumptively reasonable fee; and (4) make any appropriate adjustments to arrive at the final fee award."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“in line with those prevailing in the community for similar services by lawyers of reasonably comparable skill, experience and reputation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A] reasonable fee is a fee that is sufficient to induce a capable attorney to undertake the representation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.