Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 844 P.2d 287 - Jensen v. Morgan

Jensen v. Morgan’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently January 2019

12 state decisions

70199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Public Service Com'n of Utah · Smith v. District Court of Second Judicial District in and for Morgan County · 11 Utah 2d 41 - Mosby Irrigation Company v. Criddle · Provo City v. Hansen · Rodde v. Trousdale Construction Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “After full consideration of the statements of claims ... the state engineer shall formulate a report and a proposed determination of all rights to the use of the water ..., and a copy of the same shall be mailed by regular mail to each claimant with notice that any claimant dissatisfied therewith may within ninety days of such mailing file with the clerk of the district court a written objection thereto ....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he purpose of the general adjudication process is to prevent piecemeal litigation regarding water rights and to provide a permanent record of all such rights by decree.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`Except where provided by statute, a consolidation in equity does not merge the suits and they maintain their separate identity in so far as the parties, issues, and proof are concerned.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.