Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 844 P.2d 867 - Gregg v. State

Gregg v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Cummings v. Evans (1998), Bland v. State (2000)

3 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

160199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Franks v. Delaware · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · United States v. Ross

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To determine this issue, we ask whether the warrant would have been issued if the judge had been given accurate information.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A defendant has a due process right to be present during trial proceedings “ ‘whenever his presence has a relation, reasonably substantial, to the fullness of his opportunity to defend against the charge. [T]he presence of a defendant is a condition of due process to the extent that a fair and just hearing would be thwarted by his absence, and to that extent only.’ ” The defendant’s presence is not required where such “presence would be useless, or the benefit but a shadow.” A defendant also has a state statutory right to be present during certain communications with jurors. For instance, a trial court should not conduct communications with the jury outside the presence of counsel and the defendant during deliberations; nor should anyone communicate with the jury regarding the merits of the case prior to submission of the case to the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.