Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 844 SO2D 1082 - Deutschmann v. Rosiere

Deutschmann v. Rosiere’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 291 So. 2d 774 - Tiner v. Aetna Life Insurance Company · 368 So. 2d 1032 - Johnson v. Occidental Life Ins. Co. of Cal. · 808 So. 2d 771 - Harvey v. Cole · 730 So. 2d 1083 - Savarino v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield · 441 So. 2d 283 - Jeffers v. Hansen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. Except as provided in Subsection B of this Section and R.S. 22:692, and R.S. 22:692.1, no oral or written misrepresentation or warranty made in the negotiation of an insurance contract, by the insured or in his behalf, shall be deemed material or defeat or void the contract or prevent it attaching, unless the misrepresentation or warranty is made with the intent to deceive. B. In any application for life or health and accident insurance made in writing by the insured, all statements therein made by the insured shall, in the absence of fraud, be deemed representations and not warranties. The falsity of any such statement shall not bar the right to recovery under the contract unless such false statement was made with actual intent to deceive or unless it materially affected either the acceptance of the risk or the hazard assumed by the insurer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “affirmative duty to verify, through a reasonable investigation, whether a claim was actually excluded from coverage and when an insurer chooses to resist its contractual obligation based upon a supposed defense, which a reasonable investigation would have proved to be without merit, it acts at its peril and renders itself liable for statutory penalties and attorney's fees.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.