State v. Menard’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Anderson · Sawyer v. Barczak · State v. Green · Berkley and Company Inc Berkley and Company Inc · 502 So. 2d 537 - State v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“D. Statements which are not hearsay. A statement is not hearsay if: .... (3) Relational and privity admissions. The statement is offered against a party, and the statement is: .... (b) A statement by a declarant while participating in a conspiracy to commit a crime or civil wrong and in furtherance of the objective of the conspiracy, provided that a prima facie case of conspiracy is established....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Louisiana Code of Evidence Article 801(D)(3)(b) requires not only the establishment of a prima facie case of conspiracy, but also a finding that the statement was made while participating in the conspiracy and in furtherance of the objective of the conspiracy. Such findings are impossible without knowing the substance of the statements themselves and the context within which they were made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.