Luper v. Wal-Mart Stores’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Wilson v. City of Baton Rouge · 683 So. 2d 367 - Washington v. Lyons Specialty Co. · Marchand v. York · Carter v. Barber Bros. Contracting Co., Inc. · 815 So. 2d 156 - Schexnayder v. Exxon Pipeline Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“After all examinations have been conducted but prior to any order directing the injured employee to return to work, the employee shall be permitted, at his own expense, to consult with and be examined by a physician of his own choosing. Such report shall be considered in addition to all other medical reports in determining the injured employee's fitness to return to work. Should disagreement exist, after such consultation and examination, as to the fitness of the employee to return to work, the provisions of R.S. 23:1123 shall be followed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the claim is reasonably controverted or if such nonpayment results from conditions over which the employer or insurer had no control.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“incumbent upon Wal-Mart to respond in some form or fashion which was never done.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.