Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

844 So. 2d 772

Brady v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2003-05-14

Decided 2003-05-14

PER CURIAM.

¶1Because the record does not refute appellant’s facially valid claim that he timely requested his attorney to file a post conviction motion, which his attorney failed to do, we reverse the trial court’s order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus to file a belated Rule 3.850 motion. This case *773is remanded to the trial court for an evi-dentiary hearing on appellant’s petition.

¶2Reversed and remanded.

/844/so2d/772 · .json · Public domain