¶1Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence for sale of cocaine. We affirm, as the errors alleged are not fundamental and no timely objections were made during the proceedings. This affir-mance is without prejudice to defendant fifing motions for postconviction relief.
844 So. 2d 776
Ward v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 14, 2003
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2003-05-14
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2005
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2003-05-14
View the full empirical analysis of this case →