¶1We affirm appellant’s, Thomas Emmanuel, conviction on the charge of impregnating a child under the age of sixteen; however, we remand for resentencing. Appellee concedes, and we agree, appellant must be resentenced under the 1994 sentencing guidelines rather than the 1995 sentencing guidelines with a corrected sc.oresheet as argued by appellee.
844 So. 2d 807
Emmanuel v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 14, 2003
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2003-05-14
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2012
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2003-05-14
View the full empirical analysis of this case →