Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

844 So. 2d 817

Docket No. 5D03-39.

Haralson v. State

Gary HARALSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, et al., Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2003-05-16

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 2007

2 state decisions

Relies on 687 So. 2d 254 - Bard v. Wolson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-05-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Gary Haralson, Clermont, Pro Se.

¶2Beverly Wood Gibson, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee, Department of Corrections.

¶3No Appearance for Appellee, State of Florida.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Gary Haralson appeals the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. He contends that the trial court erred when it denied his petition without affording him an opportunity to serve a reply to the response filed by the Florida Department of Corrections ("DOC"). We agree that Haralson should have been given the opportunity to file a reply to DOC's response. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.100(k); Bard v. Wolson,687 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). Accordingly, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings so that Haralson has an opportunity to reply to DOC's response.

¶6REVERSED AND REMANDED.

¶7GRIFFIN, ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.

/844/so2d/817 · .json · Public domain