State v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2006
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Cage v. Louisiana · Youngberg v. United States · Refre v. United States · Sanders v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In reviewing defendant’s conviction, this court considers the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict ren dered by the jury. State v. Ternetz, 740 S.W.2d 713, 714 (Mo.App.1987). All evidence and inferences that tend to support the verdict are accepted as true. State v. Brown, 660 S.W.2d 694, 698-99 (Mo.banc 1983). Evidence and inferences to the contrary are disregarded. Id. “The question is whether the evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the State, is sufficient to support the verdict.” Id. at 699 , citing State v. Story, 646 S.W.2d 68, 72 (Mo.banc 1983). State v. Norris, 813 S.W.2d 379, 380 (Mo.App.1991).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McClanahan“without checking on Jackson's condition or seeking assistance for him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.