Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 845 F.2d 1451 - Martin v. Tyson

Martin v. Tyson’s Empirical Analysis

845 F.2d 1451 · 1988

Citation profile

113
cited by 113 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

47 federal appellate · 7 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 113 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2022 · most notably Lewis Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Casey (1996), Antonelli v. Sheahan (1996)

47 federal appellate · 7 district · 4 state decisions

69019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Haines v. Kerner · Bell v. Wolfish · Daniels v. Williams · Bounds v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 113 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An act or practice that violates the eighth amendment also violates the due process rights of pretrial detainees.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he arbitrary denial of access to published materials violates an inmate's first amendment rights,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “does not point to any claim that he was unable to pursue”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.