White Industries, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Co.’s Empirical Analysis
845 F.2d 1497 · 1988
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently March 2010 · most notably In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation (1997), Lewis Cic Td v. Philip Morris Incorporated (2004)
17 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 13 (§ 2 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914)
Relies on Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co. · Truett Payne Company Inc v. Chrysler Motors Corporation · Allied Van Lines, Inc. v. Small Business Administration · 657 F. Supp. 687 - White Industries, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a clear understanding of the grounds of [the district court's] decision.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“so that the parties and reviewing court understand what [has been] decided and why,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a particularized finding on each piece of evidence presented by the parties,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.