Turner v. Armontrout’s Empirical Analysis
845 F.2d 165 · 1988
Citation profile
21 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently September 2006 · most notably Flieger v. Delo (1994), Byrd v. Armontrout (1989)
21 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Chambers v. Mississippi · Sumner v. Mata · Bowsher v. Merck & Co. · Green v. Georgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] federal habeas corpus court faced with a record of historical facts that support conflicting inferences must presume * * * that the trier of fact resolved any such conflicts in favor of the prosecution, and must defer to that resolution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In making this determination courts must review the totality of the facts in the case pending before them and analyze the fairness of the particular trial under consideration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“infringes upon a specific constitutional protection or is so prejudicial that it amounts to a denial of due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Schneider v. Delo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.