Miller v. Rich’s Empirical Analysis
845 F.2d 190 · 1988
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 2016
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Arizona v. Manypenny · Carnegie v. United States · Kimball v. Commandant Twelfth Naval District · Graham v. Teledyne-Continental Motors · Kansas ex rel. Stephan v. Adams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The categories of parties should be interpreted as permitting an owner/operator to participate. Except for cases in which prearrangements for notification have been made, the IIC has no responsibility to seek out potential parties. If they [potential parties] request participation, they or their qualified representative should be permitted participation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Miller v. Rich“Appellant in the instant case is not seeking to actively participate in the disassembly and inspection, he merely wishes to observe. In Graham , the appellant sought to have his representative actually participate in the testing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Miller v. Rich“All parties must satisfy the IIC that their personnel are suitably qualified and will actually be of assistance. Approval is not automatic.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Miller v. Rich
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.