Albrecht v. Lund’s Empirical Analysis
845 F.2d 193 · 1988
Citation profile
40 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably Swartz v. KPMG LLP (2007), Wages v. Internal Revenue Service (1990)
40 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Japan Whaling Ass'n v. American Cetacean Society · Smith v. Harmsen · Gary Aircraft Corp. v. United States · Schreiber Distributing Co. v. Serv-Well Furniture Co. · Klamath-Lake Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. Klamath Medical Service Bureau
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[L]eave to amend may be denied ... if amendment of the complaint would be futile.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“allegations of other facts consistent with the challenged pleading could not possibly cure the deficiency.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.