United States v. Rioseco’s Empirical Analysis
845 F.2d 299 · 1988
Citation profile
15 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 2025
15 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 3372 · 16 U.S.C. § 3373
Relies on Minnesota v. Murphy · Carstea v. Poplar Tree Homeowners Ass'n · United States v. Monton · Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc. v. Blankenship · United States v. Sharpnack
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(A) any fish or wildlife taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of any law or regulation of any state or in violation of any foreign law, ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wood v. Verity
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.