United States v. Fuesting’s Empirical Analysis
845 F.2d 664 · 1988
Citation profile
64 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently January 2023 · most notably United States v. Moya-Gomez (1988), United States v. Doerr (1989)
64 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Wong Sun v. United States · Katz v. United States · Barker v. Wingo · Simmons v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must be specific, concrete and supported by the evidence--vague, speculative or conclusory allegations will not suffice.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage““[Fuesting’s] argument was raised for the first time on appeal, and while it is within our discretion to resolve such issues, our review is limited to the strict standards of the plain error doctrine of Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b). Under that doctrine, only an error which would result in an ‘actual miscarriage of justice’ would support reversal of Fuesting’s conviction.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Any undue delay after charges are dismissed, like any delay before charges are filed, must be scrutinized under the Due Process Clause, not the Speedy Trial Clause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.