Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 845 F.2d 981 - Specialty Composites v. Cabot Corp.

Specialty Composites v. Cabot Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

845 F.2d 981 · 1988

Citation profile

188
cited by 188 later decisions
November 2017
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 44 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 188 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc. (1995), Renishaw PLC v. Marposs Societa' Per Azioni (1998)

20 federal appellate · 44 district ·

8901988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 102 · 35 U.S.C. § 103 · 35 U.S.C. § 112

Relies on Graham v. John Deere Company of Kansas City Calmar Inc · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Marino v. United States · Jizmejian v. United States · United States v. Adams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 188 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where a specification does not require a limitation, that limitation should not be read from the specification into the claims.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Nondisclosed or false information is material if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable examiner would have considered the omitted reference or false information important in deciding whether to allow the application to issue as a patent.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “claimed invention, rather than one in the public domain, is indicative of nonobviousness”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.