West v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis
845 F.3d 1228 · 2017
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1681 (§ 901 of the Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972) · 21 U.S.C. § 801 (§ 101 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 4321 (§ 2 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969)
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Allen v. Wright · Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization · Bordenkircher v. Hayes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To establish standing, the plaintiff must show (1) it has suffered a concrete and particularized injury (2) that is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and (3) that is likely to be redressed by a favorable decision, i.e., a decision granting the plaintiff the relief it seeks.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]here is no justiciable case or controversy unless the plaintiff has standing.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[r]edressability examines whether the relief sought, assuming that the court chooses to grant it, w[ould] likely alleviate the particularized injury alleged by the plaintiff.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.