United States v. Schmidt’s Empirical Analysis
845 F.3d 153 · 2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 10 · 18 U.S.C. § 2423 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act)) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission · United States v. Clark · United States v. Pendleton · United States v. Bollinger · United States v. Weingarten
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under [ § 2423(c) ]{fs28, the government would only have to prove that the defendant engaged in illicit sexual conduct with a minor while in a foreign country. The Fourth Circuit reached the same conclusion that arrival in a country did not terminate the statutory reach of § 2423(c) by expansively interpreting the term”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A person may still be traveling even after a significant amount of time in a given location so long as the visit is sufficiently transient or contemplates some future departure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]hile intent to permanently resettle may be one factor in determining when relevant travel in foreign commerce comes to an end, it is not dispositive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.