Coleman v. Greene SCI’s Empirical Analysis
845 F.3d 73 · 2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Schlup v. Delo · Herrera v. Collins · 133 S. Ct. 1924 - McQuiggin v. Perkins · in Re: Stephen McDonald · Galli v. New Jersey Meadowlands Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“evidence of innocence so strong that a court cannot have confidence in the outcome of the trial unless the court is also satisfied that the trial was free of non-harmless constitutional error.” Coleman v. Greene, 845 F.3d 73, 76 (3d Cir. 2017) (quoting McQuiggin, 133 S.Ct. at 1936 ) (emphasis added); see also Hill, 2005 WL 1949621 , at (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Andrews v. Wingard“cases in which new evidence shows it is more likely than not that no reasonable juror would have convicted the petitioner.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The fundamental miscarriage of justice exception is narrow.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.