Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 845 F.3d 756 - Patterson v. Chrysler Group, LLC

Patterson v. Chrysler Group, LLC’s Empirical Analysis

845 F.3d 756 · 2017

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
March 2026
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1056 (§ 206 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (§ 514 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters · Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States · Pace v. Superintendent State Correctional Institution at Graterford · Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. · Fallick v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “ERISA does not explicitly provide a limitations period for § 1132(a)(1)(B) claims,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “courts fill the statutory gap using federal common law,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.