Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 845 F. Supp. 377 - May v. Dover Elevator Co.

845 F. Supp. 377 - May v. Dover Elevator Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
February 2000
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · 611 F. Supp. 1223 - In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation · Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. Dowdy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is established that, if an expert lacks a sufficiently reliable factual or scientific basis for an opinion, it would not be admissible at trial and hence cannot create a genuine dispute as to a material issue of fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.