Action Auto Stores, Inc. v. United Capitol Insurance’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 2013
1 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Atlas Concrete Pipe, Inc. v. Roger J. Au & Son, Inc. · Wendel v. Swanberg · Wehner v. Foster
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“for which the insured is obligated to pay damages by reason of the assumption of liability in a contract or agreement. This exclusion does not apply to liability for damages: (1) Assumed in a contract or agreement that is an”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“2. This insurance does not apply to: j. “Property damage” to: (5) That particular part of real property on which you or any contractors or subcontractors working directly or indirectly on your behalf are performing operations, if the “property damage” arises out of those operations;”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a. Work or operations performed by you or on your behalf; and”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.