Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

845 N.E.2d 1074

State v. Campos

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 2006

Indiana Court of Appeals · decided 2006-04-18

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2020

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-04-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SULLIVAN, Judge,

¶1dissenting.

¶2I respectfully dissent.

¶3The order of dismissal dismissed only Count I, the C felony charge. The State was left to proceed only as to the two Class A misdemeanors. The State did not proceed upon those lesser charges nor did it dismiss them. It was not required to do so.

¶4In my view, this court erred in rejecting the interlocutory appeal from the dismissal of the C felony because that issue is and was not thereafter available for review unless the State dismissed the misdemeanor charges.

¶5I would consider the instant appeal as an appropriate appeal from the dismissal.

/845/ne2d/1074 · .json · Public domain