Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 845 N.E.2d 154 - State v. Keller

State v. Keller’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · North Carolina v. Butler · Missouri v. Seibert · Georgia v. Randolph · United States v. Patane

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no formal requirement for how the State must meet its burden of advising an individual consistent with Miranda, so this court examines the issue in light of the totality of the cireum-stances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “we must review the totality of the circumstances, thereby requiring this court to review all the facts and circumstances that are particular to the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “clearly explain a person's constitutional rights and determine the accused's understanding prior to commencing an interrogation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.