Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 845 P.2d 1156 - People v. Stead

People v. Stead’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
4
states following
May 2020
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2020

20 state decisions

1101993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Halper · Dobbert v. Florida · Calder et Wife, v. Bull et Wife. · Joe Malloy v. State of South Carolina · Aue v. Diesslin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he amount of the fine imposed is correlated to the degree of felony committed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “On or after July 1, 1992, each person who is convicted of a sex offense ... shall be required to pay a surcharge to the clerk of the court in which the conviction occurs .... (emphasis supplied)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “any fine, penalty, or confinement inflicted upon a person by the authority of the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.