Hansen v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2013
1 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gray v. State · Potts v. State · DeSacia v. State · Elisovsky v. State · Thomas v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Responsibility for the crime of another will attach only upon a showing that an individual had knowledge of the criminal enterprise and specifically intended by his/ her conduct, to aid, abet, assist, or participate in the criminal enterprise. ... [I]t is necessary that the person ... participate in [the venture] as ... something that he or she wishes to bring about, and that the person seek by his or her actions to make it succeed. An accomplice shares the perpetrator’s specific intent when he or she knows the full extent of the perpetrator’s criminal purpose and gives aid or encouragement with the intent or purpose of facilitating the perpetrator’s commission of the offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Baker v. State“[any] person who in some manner ... aids, abets, assists, or participates in a criminal act”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Baker v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.