Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

845 So. 2d 314

Pruitte v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2003-05-16

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 2017

13 state decisions

Relies on 818 So. 2d 544 - Taylor v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-05-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

¶1Richard V. Pruitte argues that his violent career criminal sentence is illegal under Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), which held chapter 99-188, Laws of Florida, unconstitutional. However, his claim is facially insufficient because he has failed to allege how he was affected by the amendments to the violent career criminal statute contained within chapter 99-188. Therefore, we affirm without prejudice to any right Pruitte may have to file a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion raising this claim.

¶2Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and KELLY, J., Concur.
/845/so2d/314 · .json · Public domain