845 So. 2d 506 - State v. Millien’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Huddleston v. United States · 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur · Mann v. Oklahoma · Pollard v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. · 385 So. 2d 248 - State v. Byrd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“provided that upon request by the accused, the prosecution in a criminal case shall provide reasonable notice in advance of trial, of the nature of any such evidence it intends to introduce at trial for such purposes”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lee“assuming every fact to be proved that the evidence tends to prove, in order to convict, it must exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“shall be identical to the burden of proof required by Federal Rules of Evidence Article IV, Rule 404.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.