State v. Polk’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 1994
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the entire sentence had been set aside due to a substantive or procedural flaw in the original sentencing hearing or to lack of jurisdiction, and if the case then been remanded for an entirely new penalty hearing, a different result might well follow.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sills v. State“Section 115. This act shall not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, or proceedings that were begun before its effective date.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sills v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.