Moreno v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1993
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jones v. State · Kernahan v. State · Ex Parte McNeil
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it did not announce ready within the 90-day period”). In Moreno, the State conceded that it did not announce ready for trial within ninety days of the appellant's detention. Id. at 468 . More importantly, however, the prosecutor in Moreno said nothing for the record at the habeas corpus hearing, and, therefore, failed to prove, retrospectively, that it had been ready within the allotted time. See id. at 469 . As a result, the Houston Court of Appeals did not discuss the validity of a retrospective announcement, and we are not persuaded by its unnecessary reliance upon the State’s failure”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dixon v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.