Craig v. Lynaugh’s Empirical Analysis
846 F.2d 11 · 1988
Citation profile
29 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915
Relies on Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. · Porzig v. Nolden · Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp. · Ruiz v. Estelle · Spears v. Ol McCotter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f a judgment has been entered, a Rule 59(e) motion, or its legal equivalent, filed within 10 days after the date of entry of judgment is timely even though it has not been served on the defendants”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Reeves v. Collins“shall have no effect. A new notice of appeal must be filed within the prescribed time measured from the entry of the order disposing of the motion....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Haynes v. Hudson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.