Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 846 F.2d 1239 - West Coast Truck Lines, Inc. v. Arcata Community Recycling Center, Inc.

West Coast Truck Lines, Inc. v. Arcata Community Recycling Center, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

846 F.2d 1239 · 1988

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
4
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably Anant Ram v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (2001), United States v. Lira-Barraza (1991)

19 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

2001988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 49 U.S.C. § 10102 · 49 U.S.C. § 10701 · 49 U.S.C. § 10721 · 49 U.S.C. § 10741

Relies on United States v. Western Pacific Railroad · Alder v. United States · Engle v. Isaac · Gemelli v. Pennsylvania · Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Commercial Metals Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Except as provided in this subtitle, a carrier providing transportation or service subject to the jurisdiction of the Interstate Commerce Commission under chapter 105 of this title shall provide that transportation or service only if the rate for the transportation or service is contained in a tariff that is in effect under this subchapter. That carrier may not charge or receive a different compensation for that transportation or service than the rate specified in the tariff whether by returning a part of that rate to a person, giving a person a privilege, allowing the use of a facility that affects the value of that transportation or service, or another device.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““(a) A motor carrier of property providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission under subchapter II of Chapter 105 of this title may provide transportation of recyclable materials without charge or at a reduced rate. “(b) In this section, ‘recyclable materials’ means waste products for recycling or reuse in the furtherance of recognized pollution control programs.” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.