Stano v. Dugger’s Empirical Analysis
846 F.2d 1286 · 1988
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · Barefoot v. Estelle · Fitzpatrick v. Wainwright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“I am not fully prepared at this time as his attorney to advise him with respect to the advisability of a trial or not.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stano v. Dugger“that certainly he has the right to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stano v. Dugger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.