Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 846 F.2d 196 - Commonwealth Insurance v. Underwriters Inc.

Commonwealth Insurance v. Underwriters Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

846 F.2d 196 · 1988

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 2013 · most notably Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp. (1989), Zosky v. Boyer (1988)

14 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

1501988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 9 U.S.C. § 3

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · Landis v. North American Co. · Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An appeal from an order in a civil action, under 4 V.I.C. Section 33 (c), containing the statement by a Superior Court judge that such order involves a controlling question of law about which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation; may be sought by filing a petition for permission to appeal with the Clerk of the Court of the Supreme Court within ten days after the entry of such order in the Superior Court with proof of service on all other parties to the action in the lower court. An order as defined in this paragraph may be amended at any time to include the prescribed statement, and permission to appeal may be sought within ten days after entry of the order as amended.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.