Oxman v. WLS-TV’s Empirical Analysis
846 F.2d 448 · 1988
Citation profile
125 federal appellate · 6 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 255 later decisions — most recently June 2011 · most notably Crady v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co. (1993), Mauzy v. Kelly Services, Inc. (1996)
125 federal appellate · 6 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Herrmann v. United States · Roemer v. United States · Akers v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 255 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“) case such as Booker's, the plaintiff must show that (1) he was within the protected age group (over the age of 40); (2) he was performing according to his employer's legitimate expectations; (3) he was discharged (or demoted); and, (4) other similarly situated employees who were not in the protected class were treated more favorably (i.e., not discharged,”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“either that a discriminatory reasons more likely than not motivated the employer or that the employer's proffered explanation is incredible.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage“others not in the protected class were treated more favorably.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.