Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 846 F.2d 47 - Ahern v. Central Pacific Freight Lines

Ahern v. Central Pacific Freight Lines’s Empirical Analysis

846 F.2d 47 · 1988

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
December 2017
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated December Does Through IV v. United States (1991), Fondren v. Rd Schmidt Inc (1991)

19 federal appellate · 4 district ·

2001988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles · Worthy v. McKesson Corp. · United States v. C. McInnes · Speed Shore Corp. v. Denda

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the district court's finding that [a party] assented to the settlement and intended to be bound by it must be affirmed unless it is clearly erroneous”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “overriding public interest in settling and quieting litigation”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'[a]ssent to the terms of a settlement agreement can be implied from the circumstances, and conduct inconsistent with a refusal of the terms raises a presumption of assent upon which others may rely.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.