Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 846 F.2d 531 - United States v. Lee

United States v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

846 F.2d 531 · 1988

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
October 2010
most recently cited

28 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently October 2010 · most notably United States v. Chischilly (1994), Pau v. Yosemite Park & Curry Co. (1991)

28 federal appellate ·

3201988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments) · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Francis v. Franklin · United States v. Bailey · Michel v. United States · Gilbert v. First National Bank of Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “mere suggestion or solicitation by a government agent”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “fears that they would lose their contract with the government if they did not pay off government inspectors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[e]videntiary rulings ... will not be reversed absent some prejudice”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.