United States v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
846 F.2d 531 · 1988
Citation profile
28 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently October 2010 · most notably United States v. Chischilly (1994), Pau v. Yosemite Park & Curry Co. (1991)
28 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments) · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Francis v. Franklin · United States v. Bailey · Michel v. United States · Gilbert v. First National Bank of Jackson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“mere suggestion or solicitation by a government agent”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“fears that they would lose their contract with the government if they did not pay off government inspectors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[e]videntiary rulings ... will not be reversed absent some prejudice”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.