United States v. Dailey

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1988.

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1988-06-08

<p>Non-Argument Calendar.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 2012

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1988-06-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Non-Argument Calendar.

¶2 *708Thomas E. Harrison, Mobile, Ala., for defendant-appellant.

¶3J.B. Sessions, III, U.S. Atty., Donna B. Roberts, Asst. U.S. Atty., Mobile, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee.

¶4Before KRAVITCH, JOHNSON and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM:

¶6[1,2] The robbery of a bankteller at gunpoint is an act of “force and violence” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. section 2113(a). The evidence in this case is sufficient to support defendant’s convictions pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 2113(a) and 18 U.S.C. sec. 2113(d).

¶7AFFIRMED.