Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

846 F.2d 75

Docket No. 88-7038.

Young v. Bunch

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Feb. 23, 1988. Decided May 4, 1988.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1988-05-04

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Palmer v. Feminist Women's Health Center · Paine v. Baker · James Othel Wynn v. State of Maryland

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1988-05-04

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Darrell Lee Young, appellant pro se.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, ERVIN, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dispense with oral argument and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.* Young v. Bunch, C/A No. 87-1204-CRT (E.D.N.C. Jan. 14, 1988).

¶2

DISMISSED.

*

To the extent that Young claims the existence of misinformation in his prison file, he must exhaust his administrative remedies. See Paine v. Baker, 595 F.2d 197 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 925 (1979). To do this, Young first must request in writing that prison officials expunge the information and then give them a reasonable opportunity to respond

/846/f2d/75 · .json · Public domain