Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 846 F.2d 862 - Grady v. LeFevre

Grady v. LeFevre’s Empirical Analysis

846 F.2d 862 · 1988

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
August 2010
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently August 2010 · most notably Verdin v. O'Leary (1992), Caballero v. Keane (1994)

9 federal appellate · 1 district ·

3301988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rose v. Lundy · CPC International Inc. v. Dimmitt Agri Industries, Inc. · Daye v. Attorney General of New York · Walker v. United States · Petrucelli v. Coombe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he ways in which a state defendant may fairly present to the state courts the constitutional nature of his claim, even without citing chapter and verse of the Constitution, include (a) reliance on pertinent federal cases employing constitutional analysis, (b) reliance on state cases employing constitutional analysis in like fact situations, (c) assertion of the claim in terms so particular as to call to mind a specific right protected by the Constitution, and (d) allegation of a pattern of facts that is well within the mainstream of constitutional litigation.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “opportunity to consider all the circumstances and the cumulative effect of all the claims as a whole.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.